Clinical Research

From the completed feasibility study of the e-Fusion™ procedure to a 150 patient clinical trial.

Clinical and strategic partner

150 patient clinical trial

SynerFuse® has moved from the e-Fusion™ procedure to partnering with the Big Ten Neurosurgery Consortium to conduct its upcoming pivotal trial, serving patients across the United States.

An academic alliance of neurosurgery departments running multi-center studies across the United States. SynerFuse® is an industry partner.

17

neurosurgery programs

14

states

1/3

of the nation’s population

  • Big Ten Neurosurgery Consortium14 states
  • Additional sites4 states
The consortium’s 17 neurosurgery programs span 14 states. Source: btnc.osumc.edu

Additional sites

Texas Medical CenterTexas
Omni Surgery CenterNew York

Florida and Colorado: site names to come.

Consortium program, state and population figures: Big Ten Neurosurgery Consortium public data. SynerFuse® partnered with RQM+ (opens in a new tab) for clinical monitoring and regulatory services.

Completed feasibility study

SynerFuse® and its collaborators at the University of Minnesota and South Bend Orthopaedics completed a 15-patient feasibility study of the e-Fusion™ (also known as e-TLIF™) procedure, across two sites in two states. The study integrated spinal fusion with direct nerve stimulation utilizing the e-Fusion™ Ultra Low Energy™ (ULE™) Technology, to evaluate its effects on chronic low back and leg pain.

As reported by

“Combining DRG stimulation with lumbar fusion cuts pain 70%”

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04054401 (opens in a new tab)

North American Spine Society Journal, 2026

Integrating dorsal root ganglion stimulation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: proof of concept study (opens in a new tab)

Michael C. Park, MD, PhD; Rohan R. Lall, MD; Deepak Reddy, MD; Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD; Steven M. Falowski, MD; Nameer R. Haider, MD

Patients

15

Sites

2

Minnesota and Indiana

Follow-up

12

months

Serious adverse events

0

Years of chronic pain

7+

before the procedure, on average

Who was studied

  • Patients indicated for a fusion. This is not an alternative to fusion. It is an addition to a fusion the patient is already having.
  • Patients who experienced greater than six months of chronic low back and leg pain.
  • Lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: decompression and instrumented fusion of the lumbar or lumbosacral spine.

ULE™ Technology

under 1 mA
amplitude

Stimulation parameters as reported in the published feasibility study (Park et al., 2026). Up to 28% of patients who have surgery for chronic low back pain or radiculopathy still have that pain after a technically successful operation, likely from neuropathic pain (Park et al., 2026 (opens in a new tab)). Described for context, not a product claim.

Investigators

The published investigator team. Names that link go to their bios on the Team page.

3Neurosurgeons

Michael C. Park, MD, PhD

Former Principal Investigator, University of Minnesota

Investigator

Rohan R. Lall, MD

Former Co-Investigator, M Health Fairview

Investigator

Steven M. Falowski, MD

Chairman, Medical Advisory Board, QuantumStim

Co-author

2Orthopedic spine surgeons

Deepak Reddy, MD

Former Principal Investigator, South Bend Orthopaedics; Vice Chairman, Medical Advisory Board, QuantumStim

Investigator

Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD

Co-Investigator, University of Minnesota

Investigator

1Pain physician

Published results

These figures describe the disease state and are provided for context, not a product claim.

Back and leg pain

Average improvement in pain scores from before surgery to 12 months, all 15 patients.

0%50%100%71%Back pain69%Leg pain

Outer ring: back pain. Inner ring: leg pain. Pain was scored on a visual analog scale (VAS).

N=15 early feasibility study. Published in North American Spine Society Journal, 2026. Results from early feasibility data and may not be indicative of future outcomes.

View as a table
Back and leg pain
MeasureAverage improvement at 12 months
Back pain71%
Leg pain69%

Disability before surgery and 12 months after

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), all 15 patients.

Before surgeryMinimal disability: 6.7%Moderate disability: 6.7%Severe disability: 53.3%53.3%Crippled: 33.3%33.3%13 of 15were severely disabled or crippled (86.6%)12 months post surgeryMinimal disability: 46.7%46.7%Moderate disability: 40%40%Severe disability: 13.3%13.3%13 of 15had minimal or moderate disability (86.7%)
  • Minimal disability ODI 0–20%
  • Moderate disability ODI 20–40%
  • Severe disability ODI 40–60%
  • Crippled ODI 60–80%

Average ODI score: 52.6% before surgery, 23.1% at 12 months.

N=15 early feasibility study. Published in North American Spine Society Journal, 2026. Results from early feasibility data and may not be indicative of future outcomes.

View as a table
Disability before surgery and 12 months after
TimepointDisability bandShare of patients
Before surgeryMinimal disability6.7%
Before surgeryModerate disability6.7%
Before surgerySevere disability53.3%
Before surgeryCrippled33.3%
12 months post surgeryMinimal disability46.7%
12 months post surgeryModerate disability40%
12 months post surgerySevere disability13.3%

Opioid pain medication after surgery

As expected after spinal fusion surgery, all 15 patients were prescribed opioids in the first 24 hours. At 12 months, 3 of 15 were taking them.

Within 24 hours of surgery15 of 15 patients

80%reduction
in opioid use

At 12 months3 of 15 patients

Red capsules: within 24 hours of spinal fusion surgery, all 15 patients were prescribed opioid pain medication. Blue capsules: at 12 months after the e-Fusion™ procedure, 3 of 15. Ghosted outlines: the 12 patients no longer taking opioids.

N=15 early feasibility study. Published in North American Spine Society Journal, 2026. Results from early feasibility data and may not be indicative of future outcomes.

View as a table
Opioid pain medication after surgery
TimepointPatients taking opioidsShare
Within 24 hours of surgery15 of 15100%
At 12 months3 of 1520%

Sleep quality before surgery and 12 months after

Self-reported sleep quality, same N=15 patients. Higher categories are better.

Before surgery

14.3%Very Bad: 14.3%28.6%Bad: 28.6%42.9%Fair: 42.9%14.3%Good: 14.3%

42.9% reported Bad or Very Bad sleep

12 months after surgery

Bad: 6.7%20%Fair: 20%26.7%Good: 26.7%46.7%Very Good: 46.7%

11 of 15 reported Good or Very Good sleep (73.3%)

  • Very Bad
  • Bad
  • Fair
  • Good
  • Very Good

SynerFuse clinical data, same N=15 patient population. Sleep quality data is not included in the published paper.

N=15 early feasibility study. Published in North American Spine Society Journal, 2026. Results from early feasibility data and may not be indicative of future outcomes.

View as a table
Sleep quality before surgery and 12 months after
TimepointSleep quality
Before surgeryVery Bad 14.3%, Bad 28.6%, Fair 42.9%, Good 14.3%
12 months after surgeryBad 6.7%, Fair 20%, Good 26.7%, Very Good 46.7%

Source for pain, disability and opioid figures: Park MC, Lall RR, Reddy D, Sembrano JN, Falowski SM, Haider NR. Integrating dorsal root ganglion stimulation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: proof of concept study. N Am Spine Soc J (opens in a new tab), 2026. Read the published study (opens in a new tab). Sleep quality data: SynerFuse® clinical data, same N=15 patient population; not included in the published paper. Based on a 15-patient proof-of-concept feasibility study (Park et al., NASSJ 2026). Investigational device (IDE G190045); not FDA-approved; safety and effectiveness not established.

Research partners

Two sites, two states.

  1. 2022First e-Fusion™ procedure
  2. 2023Second study site joins
  3. 2025Study completed
  4. 2026Results published
University of Minnesota logoM Health Fairview logoSouth Bend Orthopaedics logo

University of Minnesota and M Health Fairview

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Investigators

  • Michael C. Park, MD, PhD
  • Rohan R. Lall, MD
  • Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD

South Bend Orthopaedics

South Bend, Indiana

Investigator

  • Deepak Reddy, MD